Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity by Alfredo González-Ruibal

By Alfredo González-Ruibal

Archaeology has been an enormous resource of metaphors for many of the key intellectuals of the 20th century: Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, Alois Riegl and Michel Foucault, among many others. in spite of the fact that, this strength has additionally grew to become opposed to archaeology, as the self-discipline has been handled perfunctorily as a trifling supplier of metaphors that different intellectuals have exploited. students from various fields proceed to discover components within which archaeologists were operating for over centuries, with very little connection with the self-discipline. apparently excavation, stratigraphy or ruins merely develop into very important at a trans-disciplinary point while humans from outdoor archaeology be aware of them and in some way dematerialize them. in the meantime, archaeologists were frequently extra drawn to borrowing theories from different fields, instead of in constructing the theoretical strength of a similar suggestions that different thinkers locate so useful.

The time is ripe for archaeologists to deal with a much wider viewers and interact in theoretical debates from a place of equality, now not of subalternity. Reclaiming Archaeology explores how archaeology could be worthwhile to reconsider modernity’s immense matters, and extra particularly past due modernity (broadly understood because the 20th and 21st centuries). The booklet incorporates a sequence of unique essays, now not inevitably following the normal educational principles of archaeological writing or pondering, permitting rhetoric to have its position in disclosing the archaeological. In all the 4 sections that represent this publication (method, time, historical past and materiality), the individuals take care of varied archaeological tropes, akin to excavation, surface/depth, family tree, ruins, fragments, repressed stories and lines. They criticize their modernist implications and remodel them in artistic methods, that allows you to convey the ability of archaeology not only to appreciate the previous, but in addition the current.

Reclaiming Archaeology contains essays from a various array of archaeologists who've dealt in a single manner or one other with modernity, together with students from non-Anglophone international locations who've approached the problem in unique methods in the course of fresh years, in addition to participants from different fields who have interaction in an inventive discussion with archaeology and the paintings of archaeologists.

Show description

Read or Download Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity PDF

Similar archaeology books

A History of Boeotia

Robert Buck's heritage examines the archaeological checklist, takes a clean examine what the ancients acknowledged concerning the Boeotians and on the references of classicists of more moderen instances, retells the legends, and reconstructs the historical past of the zone from the heroic Bronze Age to the Pelopponesian conflict.

Image and Audience: Rethinking Prehistoric Art

There were many bills of prehistoric 'art', yet the vast majority of them start through assuming that the idea that is an invaluable one. during this largely illustrated examine, Richard Bradley asks why old gadgets have been created and while and the way they have been used. He considers how the 1st definitions of prehistoric artistic endeavors have been made, and the ways that they may be on the topic of practices within the visible arts at the present time prolonged case experiences of 2 immensely well known and much-visited websites illustrate his argument: one considers the megalithic tombs of Western Europe, while the opposite investigates the adorned metalwork and rock carvings of Bronze Age Scandinavia.

Presenting the Past (The Archaeologist's Toolkit, V. 7)

Utilizing the proper media, archeologists can and needs to train and excite the folks who desire their details. Larry Zimmerman's earnestly enticing consultant to reporting archaeological findings argues that communique is one in all archaeology's fundamental projects.

Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology

This ebook bargains a critique of the all pervasive Western suggestion that different groups frequently stay in a undying current. Who wishes the earlier? offers first-hand facts of the curiosity non-Western, non-academic groups have long ago.

Additional info for Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity

Sample text

A. ). London: Penguin. Gallay, A. 2011. Pour une ethnoarchéologie théorique. Paris: Errance. Gere, C. 2002. Inscribing nature: Archaeological metaphors and the formation of new sciences. Public Archaeology 4: 195–208. Gillings, M. 2011. Chorography, phenomenology and the antiquarian tradition. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(1): 53–64. Ginzburg, C. 1980. Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: clues and scientific method. History Workshop 9: 5–36. Given, M. 2004. The archaeology of the colonized.

Olivier, L. 2008. Le sombre abîme du temps. Mémoire et archéologie. Paris: Seuil. Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2): 87–104. —— 2006. Scenes from a Troubled Engagement. Post-structuralism and Material Culture Studies, in C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Kuechler, M. Rowlands and P. Spyer (eds) Handbook of Material Culture, 85–103. London: Sage. —— 2010. In defense of things. Archaeology and the ontology of objects. AltaMira Press. Olsen, B.

Theatre/archaeology. London: Routledge. Penrose, S. 2007. Images of Change. Swindon: English Heritage. D. 1996. D. ) Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies, 19–27. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Rathje, W. 1979. Modern material culture studies. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 1–37. —— 2001. Integrated archaeology. A garbage paradigm, in V. Buchli and G. Lucas (eds) Archaeologies of the contemporary past, 63–76. London: Routledge. Rathje, W.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.17 of 5 – based on 4 votes